Recorridos críticos de Playwright
2 contratos de proyecto · escritorio y móvil
professional services
Gate de calidad v1.0.0
Enviar las incidencias a un agente, repetir la fase fallida y volver a evaluar.
2 contratos de proyecto · escritorio y móvil
Resultado observado: 83.8 / 100.
Too many mobile tap targets are undersized
8 incidencia(s) grave(s): Positioning is elegant but insufficiently differentiated or evidenced · Microtypography undermines readability and perceived care · Strong art direction, but a conspicuous template/editorial treatment weakens category authenticity
Falta una revisión persistida con la Rúbrica Ejecutable Archic v1.0.
Quedan por validar las pruebas en dispositivo real, teclado, lector de pantalla y veracidad del contenido.
La pasada de criterio visual no puede inferirse únicamente a partir de una puntuación numérica.
Rúbrica ejecutable v1.0
El benchmark técnico no basta para llegar a cliente. Hay que persistir una revisión de Page Modes, Section Gates, mobile, S01–S50 y G01–G10.
Cola de agentes
The lead statement clearly identifies tourist trains/trams, but it does not quickly distinguish the offer, decision criteria, or appropriate route by audience. “Cities, events, town halls and venues” is broad segmentation rather than a reason to choose this provider.
Small uppercase labels and navigation are pushed below comfortable reading and touch sizes. This is not merely an accessibility detail: it makes a professional services offer feel less legible and less assured.
The hero has a polished editorial art direction, but the combination of oversized serif headline, ultra-small all-caps metadata, hairline rules, numbered “Project brief” panel, and decorative vertical marker reads more like a generic premium-agency template than a transport specialist with established operational credibility.
The primary conversion path is repeated as links to a separate contact page, but the homepage presents no form, callback promise, response-time expectation, phone contact, or low-friction enquiry mechanism alongside the intent-building content.
The mobile hero consumes an unusually long first screen sequence before the visitor reaches any substantive portfolio, solution, proof, or contact content. The duplicated hero detail panel is particularly expensive vertically after two large CTAs.
38% of visible sampled elements render below 12 px.
72% of detected links/buttons are smaller than the 44×44 px touch target used by the benchmark.
Quality gate caps the project at 84/100 until resolved.
The primary train photograph is relevant and visually striking, but the dark treatment obscures the actual vehicle and operational environment. Two of seven images also lack alternative text, including the YouTube thumbnail and an Écija image.
The interface makes a commercial lead request prominent while omitting visible privacy and legal destinations. For Spanish public-sector, venue, and event buyers, this weakens legitimacy at the point where personal and procurement contact may be initiated.
No Content-Security-Policy response header was detected, reducing browser-side protection against unintended script/content execution.
29% of detected images do not have a non-empty alt attribute.
No legal, terms or cookies link was found in the page links.
The page does not expose a detectable privacy-policy link.